Another exciting and a nice article on the harmony of science with biblical reality. This kind of accordance strengthen my faith in God and at the same time meet the exalted pleasure. One part of the article, however, I did not like, and I quote, „Ballard said in an interview with ABC News said that, using modern technology, researched theory of two scientists from the University of Columbia that are in the area of the Black Sea occurred a great flood.
According to this theory, the Black Sea was thousands of years ago was a fresh water lake, surrounded by fertile land that were cultivated by farmers, until they found a huge amount of water from the Mediterranean Sea. “
I wonder why the article neglected biblical reason that a great flood was a result of God’s wrath in Noah’s day and the heavy rains that have brought upon the land, and not a scientific interpretation of the rising water of the Mediterranean Sea?
So much for the agreement of science and religion. For these discrepancies guilty is a man. So it’s the word of a scientist who is an atheist, or a believer who rejects science. Suffer the consequences of both religion and science. Einstein sixties at a scientific meeting in the United States said: „Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.“
This time it’s a partial, disagreement about the causes, consequences of consensus. Any better than none.